The crypto market has lost nearly all gains from the 2024-2025 US election pump

The vibes are gone.

It turns out that buying a presidency is a lot easier than fixing a structural volatility problem. For a few months, the crypto faithful lived in a fever dream where the White House was going to be an automated Bitcoin ATM. They poured $135 million into Fairshake and other PACs, effectively turning the 2024 election into a high-stakes auction for regulatory immunity. And for a while, it worked. The "Trump Pump" sent Bitcoin screaming toward six figures, fueled by promises of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the immediate firing of Gary Gensler.

But the hangover has arrived, and it’s a doozy.

The market has now clawed back nearly every cent of the gains made during that post-election euphoria. If you bought the dip when the memes were loud and the "Have Fun Staying Poor" tweets were flying, you’re likely staring at a sea of red. It’s a classic rug pull, but this time, the guy holding the rug wasn’t a developer in a hoodie—it was the cold, hard reality of governance.

The friction here isn’t just about price. It’s about the massive trade-off the industry made. Crypto spent the last two years screaming for "clarity." They wanted the adults in the room to tell them the rules so they could stop being sued. They got their wish, sort of. They traded their "counter-culture" soul for a seat at the table, only to find out the table is still subject to the laws of gravity and the Federal Reserve.

Take the "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" idea. It was the ultimate carrot. The notion that the U.S. government would start hoarding Satoshis like they were gold bars sent every degen into a frenzy. It was a $100,000 price target wrapped in a flag. But once the confetti settled, the math started looking grim. You don’t just pivot the world’s reserve currency into a volatile digital asset because a guy in a "Make Crypto Great Again" hat asked nicely. The institutional friction is immense. There are committees. There are budgets. There is the stubborn fact that Bitcoin is still a solution in search of a problem that isn't "how do I get rich without a job?"

So, the "pump" was priced in. Then the reality wasn't.

We saw Bitcoin hit those dizzying heights, flirting with $100k, only to watch it slide back down as the market realized that a "crypto-friendly" cabinet doesn’t actually change the fact that interest rates are still high and liquidity is still drying up. It’s a bitter pill. All that money spent on lobbying—more than $170 million in total across the industry—bought a lot of handshakes and a few friendly appointments. It didn't buy a floor for the price of Solana.

The retail crowd, as usual, got the short end of the stick. They’re the ones who FOMO’d in at $95k because they thought the government was going to bail them out with a national treasury buy-wall. Instead, they got a front-row seat to the retracement. The total crypto market cap has shed hundreds of billions in weeks. It’s not a crash, exactly. It’s just the air leaving a balloon that was over-inflated by political theater.

Even the altcoins, those junk-tier tokens that were supposed to moon once the SEC stopped being "mean," are bleeding out. It turns out that when you remove the threat of lawsuits, you’re left with the threat of irrelevance. Without a regulatory villain to fight, these projects actually have to provide utility. Most of them can’t. They were built for a bull market where the only metric was "how many people can we get to buy this before we dump?"

Now, the industry is left wondering what it actually bought with its $135 million. They have a friendlier Washington, sure. They might even get a new SEC chair who doesn’t treat every token like a Ponzi scheme. But they’ve learned a very expensive lesson: you can’t lobby your way out of a bear cycle. You can’t campaign away the fact that crypto is still a niche hobby for people who enjoy watching their net worth swing by 20% while they sleep.

The charts are back to where they were before the first ballot was even cast. The promises are still just promises, floating in the ether of a transition team's memo. The "Strategic Reserve" is a PowerPoint slide. The "Moon" is just a rock in space.

Was the $170 million worth it just to end up exactly where you started, only with more expensive suits?

Advertisement

Latest Post


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About   •   Terms   •   Privacy
© 2026 DailyDigest360