Recently, actor and BJP MP Ravi Kishan posted about "GST 2.0 savings," claiming goods are now cheaper, but the internet is more interested in his older call for regulating samosa prices. This begs the question: why is a seemingly trivial matter like the price of a samosa capturing more attention than broader economic reforms?
Kishan's post touted the benefits of the new GST (Goods and Services Tax) regime, asserting that it has significantly reduced the cost of goods. He stated that items priced at ₹100 would now cost ₹45 under GST 2.0. This claim was met with skepticism and even mockery on social media. Critics, including Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, ridiculed the statement, with one MLA suggesting Kishan had unveiled a new "maths syllabus of WhatsApp University".
However, this isn't the first time Ravi Kishan has made headlines with food-related issues. Earlier this year, he passionately advocated in Parliament for a law to regulate food prices, using the humble samosa as a prime example. He highlighted the stark inconsistencies in pricing and portion sizes of common dishes like dal tadka and samosas across different eateries, from roadside dhabas to upscale hotels. Kishan argued that consumers are often left guessing about the quantity and quality of food they'll receive for the price they pay, and he called for standardization and transparency in the food service industry. He proposed that restaurants should be required to list the quantity of food served, similar to the net weight displayed on packaged goods.
The focus on the samosa, rather than GST 2.0, likely stems from several factors. Firstly, the average person can easily relate to the inconsistencies in samosa pricing and size. It’s a tangible, everyday experience that resonates more deeply than abstract economic concepts like GST. The issue touches upon the common person's experience of dining out and feeling uncertain about value for money.
Secondly, Kishan's GST 2.0 claims were met with disbelief and controversy. His assertion of a massive price reduction was seen as unrealistic and potentially misleading. This undermined his credibility on the subject, leading people to dismiss his statements.
In contrast, his earlier focus on the "samosa issue" was seen as a genuine attempt to address a relatable problem faced by ordinary citizens. While some may view it as a trivial matter, it reflects a broader concern about fair pricing and transparency in the food industry. The call for standardization resonates with consumers who are tired of being overcharged or receiving inconsistent portions.
Moreover, the "samosa law" proposal taps into a deep-seated cultural connection with food. In India, food is more than just sustenance; it's an integral part of social life, celebrations, and identity. By using the samosa as a symbol, Kishan effectively tapped into this cultural significance, making his argument more appealing and memorable.
In conclusion, while Ravi Kishan's intentions with his GST 2.0 post may have been to highlight economic benefits, it failed to capture the public's imagination. The focus on the ₹10 samosa persists because it represents a relatable, everyday concern about fair pricing and transparency, and it resonates with the cultural significance of food in India. It underscores the importance of addressing issues that directly impact the daily lives and experiences of ordinary citizens.
