He hit upload. That’s how it starts now. No shadowy meetings in back alleys, no typed manifestos sent via snail mail to the local broadsheet. Just a man, a smartphone, and a 4G data plan that costs less than a decent sandwich.
Brijmohan Rathore, a resident of Kota, decided the best use of his Tuesday was to film himself threatening to shoot Rahul Gandhi and 25 other Congress MPs. He didn’t whisper it. He didn’t hide behind a VPN or a burner account. He put it right out there, into the digital ether, waiting for the algorithms to do what they do best: find an audience for rage.
Kota is a strange backdrop for this. It’s India’s pressure cooker, a city where teenagers trade their sleep and sanity for a shot at an engineering degree. It’s a factory for "success." But Rathore wasn’t looking for a seat at the IIT; he was looking for a viral moment. He found it. He also found the Rajasthan police, who weren't particularly amused by his creative direction. They picked him up faster than a trending hashtag drops off the charts.
We’re told the internet is a tool for connection. That’s the marketing copy, anyway. In reality, it’s a giant, un-moderated Skinner box. Rathore is just another subject hitting the lever, hoping for a pellet of dopamine in the form of a "like" or a "share." The friction here isn't just between political rivals; it’s between the speed of digital incitement and the slow, grinding gears of the legal system.
The police slapped him with Section 153A and 506 of the IPC. Promoting enmity. Criminal intimidation. The standard toolkit for a world where words turn into projectiles before the "post" button even stops spinning. But the real friction is the price tag. For about ₹15 a day—the cost of a base-level data pack—anybody can bypass the traditional gatekeepers of discourse. You don't need a printing press. You don't need a permit. You just need a thumb and a grudge.
Silicon Valley’s elite used to talk about "frictionless" communication as if it were a holy grail. They wanted to remove every barrier between an idea and its audience. They succeeded. Now, we’re living in the fallout. When you remove the friction, you don't just get better cat videos; you get the raw, unfiltered id of the masses delivered directly to the palms of millions.
The tech platforms will point to their Terms of Service. They’ll talk about their AI-driven moderation tools that "proactively" flag violent content. It’s a nice story. It’s also largely a fantasy. By the time a human reviewer in an offshore office—probably making pennies an hour to look at the worst parts of humanity—gets around to clicking "delete," the video has been ripped, re-uploaded, and circulated on WhatsApp. It’s a game of Whac-A-Mole played against an opponent that has infinite mallets and zero conscience.
Rathore is currently cooling his heels in a cell, but the digital ghost of his threat is likely still rattling around some forgotten corner of a Telegram group. The arrest is a band-aid on a gaping wound. It satisfies the immediate need for "consequences," but it does nothing to address the machine that made him feel like filming a death threat was a viable career move in the first place.
We’ve built a system that rewards the loudest, most extreme voices because engagement is the only metric that matters to the shareholders. If a video of a guy threatening a politician gets ten times the views of a video explaining tax policy, the algorithm knows which one to push. It doesn't have a moral compass; it has an optimization goal.
So, Rathore goes to jail. The politicians get a fresh round of headlines to use as ammunition. The police get to look efficient. And the platforms? They keep the ad revenue from the millions of clicks generated by the ensuing controversy. It’s a perfect ecosystem where everybody wins except, perhaps, the concept of a functional society.
The video is gone, or at least hidden from the casual scroller. But the infrastructure that carried it is still there, humming along, waiting for the next guy in a small town with a big grievance and a full battery.
Is the threat gone, or is it just buffered?
