The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in India is facing criticism once again, this time for cutting kissing scenes from the new Superman film. The decision has ignited a debate about censorship, artistic freedom, and cultural hypocrisy within the Indian film industry.
Specifically, the CBFC removed two kissing scenes between Superman (played by David Corenswet) and Lois Lane (played by Rachel Brosnahan). One of these was a 33-second scene where Superman lifts Lois off her feet in a shopping arcade as they kiss. The CBFC characterized these scenes as "sensual visuals". To secure a UA (Unrestricted Public Exhibition with parental guidance for children under 13) certificate for the film, the filmmakers complied with the edits. In addition to the kissing scenes, several curse words were also muted.
The decision has been met with strong reactions online, with many social media users expressing their frustration and accusing the board of hypocrisy and double standards. Some users pointed out the inconsistencies in the CBFC's approach, noting that Bollywood films often feature item songs and objectification of women, while a consensual kiss in Superman is deemed unacceptable. Some have also criticized the CBFC for allowing violence and sexual assault in films rated U (unrestricted public exhibition), while censoring kissing in a U/A-rated film.
Critics online have also pointed out that the CBFC has a history of censoring content in international films, citing instances such as the removal of a middle-finger emoji in F1 and the muting of anti-Semitic slurs in The Fabelmans. The censorship of Oppenheimer was also mentioned. This has led to questions about why international films are delivered differently to Indian audiences compared to their global releases.
The CBFC's guidelines are based on the Cinematograph Act, which enshrines freedom of speech and expression but allows for "reasonable restrictions" on grounds of "decency or morality". The 2021 dissolution of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal has further complicated the matter, leaving filmmakers with limited options for recourse.
The controversy has sparked a wider discussion about the role and relevance of the CBFC in contemporary India. Some argue that the board's censorship practices are outdated and out of touch with the values of a modern, progressive society. There are calls for the CBFC to evolve into a certification board rather than a censor board. Some are suggesting abolishing the CBFC altogether.
Amidst the criticism, some are also expressing concern about the impact of these cuts on the storytelling and viewing experience. The abrupt cuts in the film have been described as jarring and disruptive.
