Veteran politician Sharad Pawar has recently diverged from the opposition's stance on the age of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in relation to his political career. Pawar emphasized the importance of prioritizing personal milestones over political considerations, revealing that he had wished PM Modi well on his 75th birthday. Pawar, who himself has continued working past the age of 75, suggested that Modi should not stop either.
Pawar's statement carries weight, considering his own extensive political career. He became an MLA at 27 and served as Maharashtra's youngest Chief Minister at 38. He has been Chief Minister four times and has also served as Defence Minister.
In 2022, Pawar was asked to react to PM Modi's comment that he "entered politics holding Mr. Pawar's finger". Pawar quipped, "I had no idea that it would cost me so much". At that time, Pawar, then 81, distanced himself from the race to become a prime ministerial candidate in 2024, stating he would focus on uniting non-BJP parties.
Pawar's recent comments come amidst discussions and debates, seemingly within the opposition, about PM Modi's age and its relevance to his political future. By publicly stating that age should not be a barrier to continued service, Pawar has broken ranks with those who might be using Modi's age as a point of criticism.
In December 2023, at a bullock cart race organized for his 83rd birthday, Pawar responded to critics who comment on his age. He asserted that he hadn't grown old and still possessed the strength to "straighten some people out". Also in December 2023, PM Modi wished Sharad Pawar a happy 83rd birthday. In December 2024, PM Modi again extended birthday wishes to Sharad Pawar on his 84th birthday and prayed for his long and healthy life.
Pawar's stance reflects a pragmatic approach, focusing on the capabilities and contributions of an individual rather than solely on their age. He has stressed prioritizing personal milestones over politics. His comments are also a testament to his independent political thinking and willingness to express opinions that may differ from the general consensus within his political sphere.