Rohit Sharma's recent retirement from Test cricket has ignited a wave of reactions, with a former India captain suggesting the decision was "long overdue," sparking considerable debate within the cricketing fraternity.
Sharma, 38, announced his retirement via an Instagram story, marking the end of an 11-year Test career. He expressed gratitude for the opportunity to represent India in the longest format of the game and stated his intention to continue playing ODIs. Sharma played 67 Tests, amassing 4,301 runs at an average of 40.57, including 12 centuries and 18 half-centuries. His highest score was a memorable 212 against South Africa in 2019. He also captained India in 24 Tests, winning 12 and losing 9.
While many fans and former teammates acknowledged Sharma's contributions and wished him well, some felt his Test career had run its course. This sentiment was echoed by a former Indian captain, who, while not named, reportedly stated that Sharma's retirement was "long overdue." This remark has triggered a range of responses, with some agreeing that Sharma's recent form justified his exit, while others defended his legacy and leadership.
Several factors may have contributed to the perception that Sharma's Test retirement was inevitable. After a promising start to his Test career, his form had become inconsistent in recent years. In his last eight Tests, he averaged just 10.93, crossing the 50-run mark only once. He also sat out of the decisive fifth Test against Australia. Furthermore, India suffered a 3-0 home series defeat to New Zealand and a 3-1 loss in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy against Australia under his captaincy.
However, many argue that Sharma's contributions to Indian cricket should not be overlooked. He holds the record of best win percentage as India captain behind Kohli. As a captain, he won half of his 24 Tests. Former teammates like Yuvraj Singh and Rishabh Pant lauded Sharma's leadership and impact on the team. Manoj Tiwary, another former teammate, expressed disappointment that Sharma did not receive a more ceremonious farewell, given his significance to the Indian team.
Former India coach Ravi Shastri revealed that he would have advocated for Sharma to play the final Test match against Australia earlier this year, despite his poor form. Shastri believed that Sharma's match-winning ability could have made a difference, even in a low-scoring game.
Sharma's retirement has also sparked discussions about the future of India's Test captaincy. With the new World Test Championship cycle beginning soon, the selectors will need to identify a suitable candidate to lead the team. Jasprit Bumrah is considered a strong contender, having already captained India in the past.
Meanwhile, Sharma has clarified his plans for ODI cricket, stating that he will continue to play as long as he feels he can contribute to the team. He has also emphasized his evolved approach to batting, aiming for a more aggressive style. Sharma's decision to retire from Tests reflects a broader trend of players managing their workload across different formats. By focusing on ODIs, he aims to prolong his career and contribute to India's success in the format.