The Indian National Congress (INC) has unleashed a barrage of criticism against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government's foreign policy, alleging a "collapse" and failure of outreach on multiple fronts. These accusations, particularly amplified following "Operation Sindoor," highlight a growing divide between the ruling party and the opposition regarding India's standing on the global stage.
A key point of contention revolves around India's relationship with Pakistan. Congress leaders have questioned why India is still perceived as being hyphenated with Pakistan, suggesting a failure to establish a distinct and independent global identity. This criticism was sharpened by claims that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had forewarned Pakistan about Operation Sindoor, an allegation the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has vehemently denied, clarifying that Pakistan was informed only after the operation had commenced.
Adding fuel to the fire, the Congress has attacked Jaishankar, likening him to "Jaichand," a historical figure known for betraying his own kingdom, accusing him of compromising national interests. This followed Jaishankar's statement about New Delhi informing Islamabad about the launch of Operation Sindoor. The party also questioned the government's decision to halt Operation Sindoor prematurely, especially when Indian forces were supposedly gaining ground against terror camps.
Furthermore, the INC has voiced concerns over India's deteriorating relations with its neighboring countries. Once considered a friendly and aligned nation, Bangladesh, particularly after last summer's political upheaval, is now viewed with concern. The party is particularly worried about the plight of the Hindu minority in Bangladesh. More broadly, critics argue that India has lost influence in South Asia, with smaller states drifting towards China, undermining India's role as a regional leader.
India's balancing act between major global powers has also come under scrutiny. While the nation's strategic autonomy and multi-alignment approach is often touted as a strength, critics argue it has led to indecisiveness and unattended regional concerns. India's stance on the Ukraine conflict, for instance, has drawn flak for prioritizing strategic goals over supporting democratic regimes, as exemplified by its reluctance to criticize the invasion.
The Congress has also accused the Modi administration of yielding to American pressure, citing the recent imposition of import duties on Indian goods by the U.S. They have also criticized the government’s silent acceptance of the deportation of Indian migrants from the U.S. and its inadequate response to the persecution of the Hindu diaspora there.
However, some analysts suggest that the Congress's criticism is rooted in political prejudice and a refusal to acknowledge any positive aspects of the government's foreign policy. They point to instances where the opposition seems to shift its stance depending on the outcome, criticizing both engagement and non-engagement with countries like China.
Despite the opposition's attacks, it is unlikely that there will be a major shift in India's foreign policy. Both the BJP and the Congress share a broad consensus on many key issues, including the importance of strong ties with the U.S. and the need to combat cross-border terrorism. The BJP's actions toward Pakistan, including the 2019 strike on Pakistani territory, have been bolder than what the Congress did after the Mumbai attacks in 2008. Under Modi 3.0, India will likely retain its foreign policy course.
In conclusion, the Congress's broadside against the government's foreign policy reveals deep-seated disagreements over its direction and effectiveness. Accusations of failed outreach, compromised national security, and a lack of international support paint a grim picture of India's global standing. While some see these criticisms as politically motivated, they nonetheless raise important questions about the country's strategic choices and their impact on its regional and global influence.