While Dubai is a part of the United Arab Emirates today, there was a time when its inclusion in the newly formed India was a distinct possibility. This potential union, though ultimately unrealized, reflects a fascinating chapter in the history of both regions, influenced by British colonial policies, shifting political landscapes, and the visions of key leaders.

The historical connections between India and the region encompassing the modern-day UAE stretch back millennia. Ancient trade networks flourished between the Indus Valley Civilization and Mesopotamia, with the UAE serving as a crucial link. For centuries, merchants from India traded spices, textiles, and other goods for pearls and dates from the Gulf. These interactions fostered cultural exchange and a shared history, laying the groundwork for the close ties that exist today. Moreover, a century ago, a significant portion of the Arabian Peninsula, including the territories of modern-day Yemen, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait, was legally integrated into India under the Interpretation Act of 1889.

During British rule, the region, then known as the Trucial States, was administered by the British government, which also managed India's foreign policy and defense. The Indian Rupee was legal tender, underscoring the close economic integration. As India moved towards independence in the 1940s, the future of the Trucial States became a topic of discussion.

Several factors contributed to the idea of Dubai potentially becoming part of India. Geographically, Dubai is situated relatively close to the Indian subcontinent. Its strong trade links with India, and the large Indian merchant presence in the emirate, further strengthened this connection. Some historians suggest that Sheikh Rashid Al Maktoum, the then-ruler of Dubai, even considered the possibility of joining India. Integrating Dubai into India could have offered significant economic advantages, including access to a larger market and enhanced trade opportunities. For India, the inclusion of Dubai, with its strategic location and growing importance as a trading hub, would have been a major boon.

However, several factors militated against this union. The political landscape was rapidly changing, with the British preparing to withdraw from the region. There was a growing sense of Arab nationalism and a desire for independence among the Trucial States. Furthermore, the cultural and religious differences between Dubai and India could not be ignored. Dubai was predominantly Arab and Muslim, while India was a diverse nation with a Hindu majority. These differences might have posed challenges in integrating Dubai into the Indian union. Ultimately, it was decided that India would "not be allowed to run the Persian Gulf" after gaining independence. In April 1947, the Gulf states were separated from India, and the Indian Political Service was replaced by British administration.

In the end, Dubai, along with the other Trucial States, chose the path of independence. In 1971, Dubai joined with Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajman, Umm Al Quwain, and Fujairah to form the United Arab Emirates. Ras Al Khaimah joined shortly after. This new nation charted its own course, leveraging its oil reserves and strategic location to become a major economic and cultural force in the region.

While Dubai did not become a part of India, the close ties between the two regions have endured. India and the UAE maintain strong political, economic, and cultural relations. A large Indian expatriate community resides in the UAE, contributing significantly to the country's economy. Trade between the two nations is robust, and the UAE is a major investor in India. The historical possibility of Dubai joining India serves as a reminder of the complex and intertwined histories of the two regions. It also underscores the enduring bonds of friendship and cooperation that continue to flourish between India and the United Arab Emirates.