To solidify their center ice position, the Boston Bruins should consider making a bold move to acquire Mason McTavish from the Anaheim Ducks. This suggestion comes from Bruins insider Connor Ryan of the Boston Globe. After a disappointing 2024-25 season, the Bruins are looking to become a playoff contender again, and a true first-line center is crucial for achieving this goal.

Ryan argues that the Bruins need to form a strong "1-2 punch" with prospect James Hagens to build a new core. He notes that Elias Lindholm, who is 30 years old, might transition into more of a third-line center later in his career, further emphasizing the need for a top-tier center. Acquiring McTavish would provide both immediate impact and long-term stability down the middle.

McTavish, selected third overall in the 2021 NHL Entry Draft, has been the subject of trade rumors throughout the summer as he is not yet signed to an extension by the Anaheim Ducks. Last season, he recorded 22 goals and 30 assists in 76 games. His addition could give the Bruins one of the most dynamic center duos in the NHL for years to come.

However, acquiring McTavish would require the Bruins to part with significant assets. Ryan believes the Ducks would likely demand multiple first-round picks, along with prospects such as Fraser Minten or Matthew Poitras, and potentially young NHL players. Furthermore, the Bruins would need to be prepared to offer McTavish a substantial contract extension, with recent speculation suggesting he may be seeking around $7-$8 million per season on a long-term deal.

While trading first-round picks involves risk, especially for a team that could potentially land another top-10 pick, McTavish represents a high-upside addition with established production and room to grow, especially given his age.

The Bruins expect to compete for a playoff spot in 2026, but there are doubts about whether they currently have the roster to do so. While McTavish may not single-handedly guarantee a championship, he has the potential to be a key piece in the Bruins' future success. The question remains: how much risk are the Bruins willing to take to realize that potential?