Supreme Court rebuffs Senthil's plea: Holding public office is untenable given the existing legal framework.

New Delhi, October 6, 2025 – In a significant development, the Supreme Court has addressed the matter of former Tamil Nadu minister V. Senthil Balaji's eligibility to hold public office amidst an ongoing trial related to a "cash-for-jobs" scam. The court declined to clarify its previous order regarding Balaji's potential reappointment as minister, stating that the original order was sufficiently clear. This legal development has potentially far-reaching implications for Balaji's political future and the stability of the Tamil Nadu government.

The issue arose after Balaji, who had previously resigned from his ministerial post, sought clarification from the Supreme Court on whether he could resume his duties while facing trial in the alleged money-laundering case. Balaji's counsel, Kapil Sibal, argued that the court's earlier observations should not be interpreted as a bar against his client holding public office, as these observations were not explicitly stated in the written order. Sibal emphasized that the bail conditions already allowed for a recall if any witness tampering occurred. He contended there could not be an injunction by the court on him becoming a minister while he is being prosecuted.

However, the Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, expressed concerns regarding the potential influence Balaji's return to a ministerial position could exert on the proceedings. Justice Kant stated that the court had not prevented Balaji from taking over the post of minister and it cannot prevent. However, the court noted that after Balaji became a minister shortly after being granted bail, there were concerns he was exercising some influence in the trial of cases.

Justice Bagchi clarified that the order did not impose an outright injunction, but noted the potential impact on the state if Senthil Balaji assumed office amid the ongoing allegations.

Sensing the court's stance, Sibal withdrew the plea seeking clarification. The court permitted unconditional withdrawal of the application.

Adding another layer to the legal proceedings, the Supreme Court also addressed the matter of transferring Balaji's trial. The court issued a notice regarding a suggestion to move the trial from Chennai to Delhi, citing concerns about a potentially "charged" atmosphere in Tamil Nadu. The bench also suggested the witnesses depose online. Furthermore, the court directed the state to propose names for special public prosecutors.

Balaji's legal troubles stem from his arrest in June 2023 by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with the cash-for-jobs scam. The allegations involve bribes allegedly taken in exchange for government job placements during his tenure as Transport Minister between 2011 and 2015. Balaji was granted bail by the Supreme Court in September 2024 after nearly 14 months of incarceration.

The Supreme Court has indicated that while it is not explicitly preventing Balaji from holding office, any attempts to influence witnesses or obstruct the course of justice could lead to the revocation of his bail. The court suggested that Balaji seek explicit permission if he intended to assume ministerial duties.


Written By
With an observant eye, a genuine interest in people, and a passion for sports, Aanya is a budding journalist eager to capture her community's defining stories. She believes in the power of local narratives to foster connection and understanding. Aanya, also an avid sports enthusiast, is currently honing her interviewing skills, focusing on active listening and drawing out the human element in every story she pursues.
Advertisement

Latest Post


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About   •   Terms   •   Privacy
© 2025 DailyDigest360