Supreme Court Revokes Order Regarding Allahabad High Court Judge Following Chief Justice of India's Letter.
  • 311 views
  • 2 min read

The Supreme Court (SC) has recalled its August 4th order that effectively removed an Allahabad High Court judge, Justice Prashant Kumar, from hearing criminal cases. This decision, made on August 8, 2025, followed a letter from Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai requesting the SC bench to reconsider its directives.

The initial order by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, was prompted by their concerns regarding an order passed by Justice Kumar. The Supreme Court had criticized Justice Kumar for allowing criminal prosecution in a case that they viewed as essentially a civil dispute. Specifically, Justice Kumar had refused to quash a criminal complaint, stating that the availability of a civil remedy for money recovery was not a sufficient ground to quash the complaint. The Supreme Court bench had described Justice Kumar's order as "absurd" and "one of the worst" they had ever encountered.

In its August 4 order, the Supreme Court directed the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court to immediately withdraw the criminal determination from Justice Kumar. It further directed that Justice Kumar be assigned to sit in a division bench with a seasoned senior judge of the High Court and that he should not be assigned any criminal determination until he leaves office. The Supreme Court also sent a copy of the order to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court.

This initial order led to disquiet within the legal community, with many viewing the SC's actions as an overreach that encroached upon the authority of the High Court Chief Justice, who is traditionally the "master of the roster" and responsible for assigning cases to judges. Concerns were raised that the Supreme Court should not have withdrawn work from a High Court judge based on a differing legal viewpoint. Several judges of the Allahabad High Court sought a full court reference to discuss the Supreme Court's observations and directions against their colleague.

In response to the CJI's letter, the Supreme Court bench agreed to reconsider its earlier directives. On August 8, 2025, the bench recalled paragraphs 25 and 26 from its August 4 order, which contained the directions to remove Justice Kumar from criminal cases. The bench clarified that its intention was not to cause embarrassment or cast aspersions on Justice Kumar. They stated that the directions were initially issued to ensure the dignity of the judiciary was upheld. The Supreme Court acknowledged the High Court Chief Justice's authority over the roster and stated that their directions were not intended to interfere with the Chief Justice's administrative powers. The bench emphasized that the High Courts are integral to the judicial system and not separate entities.

While recalling its earlier order, the Supreme Court maintained that the original High Court order was "perverse" and "illegal," expressing serious concern over its reasoning. The bench left it to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court to look into the matter.

The Allahabad High Court Bar Association welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to withdraw its remarks against Justice Kumar. The President of the Bar Association, Anil Tiwari, stated that the Supreme Court realized it had made a wrong order and that withdrawing it was a positive step.


Writer - Aarav Verma
With a curious mind, a notepad always in hand, and a passion for sports, Aarav is eager to explore the stories unfolding in his community. He's focused on developing strong interviewing skills, believing in local news's power to connect people. Aarav is particularly interested in human-interest pieces and learning the fundamentals of ethical reporting, often drawing parallels between journalistic integrity and the fair play found in sports.
Advertisement

Latest Post


World  |  Aug 08, 2025
The Supreme Court of India has agreed to examine the constitutional validity of Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which is seen as the successor to the colonial-era sedition law. A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices...

World  |  Aug 08, 2025
A Delhi court has rejected the plea of Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper case, seeking release on the grounds that he had already served the maximum sentence of seven years for the alleged offenses. Spec...

World  |  Aug 08, 2025
The Supreme Court is considering the formation of a committee headed by a retired High Court judge to manage the Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan, until the Allahabad High Court decides on the validity of the Uttar Pradesh government's ordinance rega...

Entertainment  |  Aug 08, 2025
Faisal Khan, brother of Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan, has previously spoken about a tumultuous period in his life marked by a strained relationship with his family, including Aamir. Several years ago, Faisal alleged that Aamir took control of his f...

Advertisement
Entertainment  |  Aug 08, 2025
Faisal Khan, the brother of Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan, has recently made startling claims about his experiences within the film industry and his personal life. In a recent interview, Faisal alleged that he faced rejection from prominent figures ...

Sports  |  Aug 08, 2025
The Columbus Blue Jackets are facing a pivotal moment with young star Adam Fantilli as he approaches the end of his entry-level contract. The rising NHL salary cap, projected to reach $95. 5 million in 2025-26, $104 million in 2026-27, and $113. 5 mill...

Technology  |  Aug 08, 2025
EthereumMax (EMAX) investors have secured a partial win in their class-action lawsuit against celebrity promoters and individuals tied to the token. A California judge has granted a motion allowing class-action lawsuits filed in four U. S. states to m...

Sports  |  Aug 08, 2025
The Indiana Fever are navigating a complex situation as they continue their season without star guard Caitlin Clark, who is sidelined with a right groin injury. Clark, who was injured on July 15 in a win against the Connecticut Sun, has no firm retur...

Advertisement
About   •   Terms   •   Privacy
© 2025 DailyDigest360