CJI Kant to Implement Argument Deadlines for Lawyers
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant is set to introduce a significant change in Supreme Court procedures by requiring lawyers to provide specific timelines for concluding their arguments in cases. This move aims to improve the efficiency of court proceedings and ensure judicious use of time, ultimately enhancing accessibility to justice for everyday litigants.
The CJI's decision stems from a desire to streamline case hearings and address delays. The Supreme Court has been grappling with a substantial backlog of cases, and one of the contributing factors is the extended duration of arguments presented by lawyers. By setting deadlines, the court intends to encourage lawyers to be more concise and focused in their presentations, thereby expediting the resolution of cases.
Justice Kant initially indicated this advisory in May of 2025 and is expected to implement it after the summer break. This directive, which is described as an advisory, will likely require lawyers to submit, in advance, the estimated time they need to wrap up their arguments.
In November 2025, on his first day as the Chief Justice of India, Justice Kant also established a new norm requiring written requests for urgent case listings, except in extraordinary circumstances like death penalty or personal liberty matters. Addressing lawyers seeking urgent dates for their matters, CJI Kant stated that the era of daily queues for oral mentioning must end. He emphasized that the court's time should not be consumed by mentioning requests and that lawyers must adhere to the procedures he outlined.
The CJI's initiative has been met with mixed reactions from the legal fraternity. Some lawyers appreciate the effort to improve court efficiency and reduce delays. They believe that setting deadlines will encourage better preparation and more focused arguments. However, others express concerns that strict timelines may compromise their ability to present their case effectively, especially in complex matters. Some fear that it might lead to overlooking crucial details and potentially affect the quality of justice.
The implementation of argument deadlines is expected to bring about a cultural shift in the Supreme Court. Lawyers may need to adapt their strategies and presentation styles to adhere to the set timelines. The court registry will likely play a crucial role in monitoring and managing the deadlines, ensuring that cases progress smoothly. It remains to be seen how strictly these deadlines will be enforced and whether any flexibility will be allowed based on the nature and complexity of the case.
In related news, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with an order of the Allahabad High Court regarding the whitewashing of a mosque in Sambhal. The court directed that the mosque committee should reimburse expenses for the whitewashing work.
