The Supreme Court of the United States concluded the year 2025 having handled a staggering 75,000 cases, a feat unmatched by any top court globally. This unprecedented caseload underscores the immense pressure and workload faced by the justices and court staff. The types of cases before the court ranged from emergency appeals to final verdicts on significant legal questions.

Several factors contributed to this high number. The increase in the "shadow docket," where the court makes interim decisions, has significantly added to the workload. This rise is attributed, in part, to the Trump administration's frequent appeals. Moreover, the complexity and importance of the cases accepted for review have also played a role.

Among the most prominent cases heard during the year were those concerning President Trump's policies, including challenges to his tariffs and executive orders. The court also addressed issues regarding the powers of the president over the economy, and the ability to fire members of the Federal Reserve.

In addition to cases directly related to the executive branch, the Supreme Court grappled with several high-profile social issues. These included cases related to transgender rights, such as whether states can ban gender-affirming care for minors and whether transgender women can participate in women's sports. The court also considered cases involving campaign spending limits, electioneering, and challenges to state laws under the Voting Rights Act.

The court's decisions in 2025 have had a wide-ranging impact on American law and society. For example, the court ruled on whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act authorizes the President to impose tariffs. It also addressed questions about remedies that a federal judge can give when people challenge an executive order.

Looking ahead, the Supreme Court's docket for the 2025-2026 term promises to be equally significant. Cases already accepted for review include questions about holding internet service providers liable for copyright infringement, double jeopardy, and whether a state law requiring expert affidavits in certain cases must be applied in federal court.

The justices will also consider whether President Trump can continue with his tariffs. Other high-profile issues include state bans on conversion therapy, transgender athletes' participation in sports, and campaign spending limits. These cases highlight the court's role in shaping American law and its impact on society.