In light of recent events, particularly the U.S. actions in Venezuela, the Monroe Doctrine, a long-standing principle of American foreign policy, is facing a significant reality check. M.J. Akbar, former Minister of State for External Affairs, has commented on the implications of these events for the new world order.

The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, asserted the U.S.'s dominance in Latin America, essentially declaring the region its "parish". This doctrine, which had been somewhat set aside in the post-World War II era with the emergence of an international order, is now being revisited. The recent U.S. intervention in Venezuela, including the reported capture of President Nicolas Maduro, is seen by some as a resurgence of this doctrine, raising concerns about the future of national sovereignty and the relevance of international rules.

Akbar characterized the U.S. action as a return to the Monroe Doctrine, suggesting that the U.S. views Latin America as within its sphere of influence, echoing President Monroe's message to Congress in December 1823. He argues that this represents a hegemonic principle, especially considering questions surrounding the legitimacy of elections and the state of democracy in Venezuela. Akbar also stated that the U.S. actions are driven by a desire to control the region's resources, particularly minerals and oil, rather than promoting democracy.

The situation in Venezuela has sparked international reactions, with Russia and China expressing their opposition to what they perceive as American hegemony. Akbar notes that while these nations may not be able to directly intervene militarily, their opposition could turn Venezuela into a major conflict zone. The targeting of a sitting head of state is perceived as a violation of international norms and an act of war, with potentially far-reaching consequences.

For countries like India, the Venezuelan crisis serves as a reminder of the importance of strategic autonomy and robust security. Akbar stresses that there is no substitute for strong security measures to safeguard national independence in an international system where some powers are willing to exert pressure when confronted with a nation's independent stance.

The unfolding events in Venezuela highlight the vulnerability of the international order to powerful nations that prioritize their interests and the potential for the resurgence of outdated doctrines like the Monroe Doctrine. The situation underscores the need for a more balanced and multipolar world order that respects the sovereignty and independence of all nations.