In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India has reportedly expressed its dissatisfaction with the Telangana government's handling of the phone-tapping case involving former Special Intelligence Bureau (SIB) chief T Prabhakar Rao. While details of the court's specific remarks are still emerging, it is understood that the apex court has extended protection from coercive action to Rao.
The case revolves around allegations of illegal surveillance and phone tapping carried out during the previous BRS regime. Rao is accused of keeping illegal surveillance on targeted individuals under the guise of tracking marxists. The Telangana government has alleged that Rao is withholding access to his iCloud accounts, which they claim contain crucial evidence.
The Supreme Court had earlier directed Rao to surrender to the police for interrogation, extending his custody until December 25, 2025. While the court allowed for his release after interrogation on December 26, it also stipulated that no coercive action be taken against him until the next hearing. The recent hearing on January 16, 2026, saw the court further extend this protection, although the full scope and reasons behind the decision are still awaited.
During earlier proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued for the extension of Rao's police custody, alleging non-cooperation with the investigation. Conversely, Rao's counsel, Ranjeet Kumar, claimed harassment during interrogation, stating that his client was being questioned extensively.
The case has seen several twists and turns, with Rao initially challenging the Telangana High Court's dismissal of his anticipatory bail plea. In May 2025, the Supreme Court granted Rao interim protection from coercive action, mandating his return to India upon receiving his passport. A Hyderabad court had also issued a proclamation order against Rao, threatening to declare him a proclaimed offender if he failed to appear before the court.
The Supreme Court has scheduled the matter for further hearing, and the developments in the coming weeks will be critical in determining the future course of the investigation. The court's apparent displeasure with the Telangana government's approach adds another layer of complexity to an already sensitive case.
