The Supreme Court is currently reviewing the extent of the Election Commission of India's (ECI) power to conduct Special Intensive Revisions (SIR) of electoral rolls, with a focus on ensuring these powers are not exercised in an "untrammelled, unregulated" manner. The court's observations came during hearings on petitions challenging the ECI's decision to conduct SIR across various states.

The core issue revolves around the balance between the ECI's constitutional mandate to conduct free and fair elections and the potential for these powers, specifically concerning SIR, to infringe upon citizens' rights if not properly regulated. The Supreme Court is examining whether the ECI's authority to hold SIR is beyond judicial review.

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court has raised concerns about the "stress and strain" caused by the SIR, particularly in West Bengal, where a significant number of residents have received notices regarding discrepancies in their documents. The court has stressed the need for transparency and a fair process in voter verification. The ECI has been asked to ensure that the process does not cause undue hardship to ordinary citizens.

The ECI has defended its actions by asserting that Article 324 of the Constitution grants it the power to conduct SIR. The ECI has also stated that the method of verification of citizenship for electoral purposes is 'liberal, soft-touch'. The Supreme Court acknowledged that the Election Commission has widest discretion, but its deviations for SIR cannot be 'untrammelled, unregulated'.

In December 2025, the Supreme Court addressed reports of threats to Booth Level Officers (BLOs) involved in SIR 2.0, emphasizing that the ECI must address such incidents to prevent "anarchy". The Court insisted on the ECI's authority to act against threats to BLOs and other field officers.

The phrase "unruly horse" has been used in legal contexts to describe public policy, a principle that, if unchecked, can be unpredictable and undermine stability. The Supreme Court's reference to the ECI's powers potentially being like an "unruly horse" suggests a need for careful regulation and a balanced approach to prevent the misuse of authority while upholding the integrity of the electoral process. The court is seeking to ensure that the ECI's powers are exercised responsibly and with due consideration for the rights and well-being of citizens.