Following India's "Operation Sindoor" targeting alleged terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the international community has reacted with a mix of concern, calls for de-escalation, and nuanced understanding of India's position. The operation, launched in response to the deadly April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 civilians, has triggered a complex web of diplomatic activity and varying responses from global powers.
Several nations have urged restraint from both India and Pakistan. China has called on both countries to prioritize peace and stability, remain calm, and avoid actions that could further complicate the situation, while also reiterating its opposition to all forms of terrorism. Similarly, Russia expressed deep concern over the escalating military confrontation and urged both sides to show restraint, condemning terrorism in all its forms. The United Kingdom has also called for restraint and dialogue, offering support to both countries in finding a diplomatic path forward. The United Arab Emirates has also joined the call for de-escalation, urging both nations to avoid further actions that could threaten regional and international peace.
Some countries have expressed understanding and support for India's right to self-defense against cross-border terrorism. Israel has explicitly backed India's right to self-defense, stating that terrorists should have nowhere to hide. France acknowledged India's desire to protect itself from terrorism but also urged restraint to protect civilians and avoid escalation.
The United States' reaction has been more nuanced. President Donald Trump acknowledged the situation, expressing hope for a quick resolution. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the U.S. was closely monitoring the situation and would continue to engage with both countries toward a peaceful resolution. The US has offered assistance to help India and Pakistan "work it out".
Several factors are shaping the global response. The timing of the operation, following a series of high-level diplomatic engagements by India, has allowed New Delhi to present its case to key international players. India has emphasized that the strikes were "measured, non-escalatory, proportionate, and responsible," targeting only terrorist infrastructure and avoiding civilian or military targets. India briefed envoys of 13 of the 15 United Nations Security Council members on its actions.
The international community is also mindful of the broader implications of escalating tensions between two nuclear-armed neighbors. The potential for regional instability and the impact on global security are key considerations for world leaders. The history of conflict between India and Pakistan, including the 2019 Pulwama attack and subsequent cross-border hostilities, looms large in the current context.
Domestically, "Operation Sindoor" has been met with widespread support in India. The action is seen as a strong response to the Pahalgam terror attack and a demonstration of the government's commitment to combating terrorism. Opposition parties have also voiced their support for the armed forces.
Going forward, the focus will likely be on de-escalation and preventing further escalation. The international community will be closely watching for any signs of further military action or heightened tensions. The role of regional and international mediators, including the United Nations, will be crucial in facilitating dialogue and promoting a peaceful resolution.
India has described "Operation Sindoor" as "focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature", signaling to Pakistan and the international community that it does not seek full-scale conventional war.
