Rahul Gandhi has recently asserted the importance of English language education in India, calling it "empowering" rather than "shameful," and advocating for its widespread inclusion in the education of every child. His comments, made on Friday, June 20, 2025, have sparked a renewed discussion about language policy and access to opportunity in the country.
Gandhi's statement comes amid ongoing debates about the role of English versus regional languages in education and employment. He directly responded to reported remarks by Home Minister Amit Shah regarding the use and promotion of English, framing his argument in terms of equity and social mobility.
In a post on social media platform X, Gandhi articulated his stance in Hindi, stating that "English is not a dam, it is a bridge. English is not shameful, it is empowering. English is not a chain—it is a tool to break the chains." This metaphorical language underscores his belief that English can serve as a means of connection, empowerment, and liberation, particularly for those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Gandhi went on to accuse the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) of deliberately hindering English education for underprivileged children. He argued that these organizations fear that providing access to English would empower these children to "ask questions, move ahead, and attain equality," thus challenging the existing social hierarchy. This is a serious claim, suggesting a deliberate attempt to limit opportunity based on socioeconomic status.
The Congress leader emphasized the contemporary relevance of English, asserting that it is as important as one's mother tongue in today's world. He argued that proficiency in English significantly enhances employment prospects and boosts individual confidence. This perspective aligns with the reality of a globalized economy where English often serves as the primary language of international business and communication.
Gandhi also acknowledged the value of India's diverse linguistic heritage. "Every language of India has soul, culture, and knowledge," he stated, advocating for the preservation and celebration of all Indian languages. However, he maintained that this should not come at the expense of English education. He envisions a future where every Indian child is proficient in both their mother tongue and English, enabling them to compete on a global stage while staying connected to their cultural roots.
The debate around English language education in India is complex and multifaceted. Proponents argue that it opens doors to global opportunities and enhances economic competitiveness. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns about linguistic imperialism and the marginalization of regional languages. They advocate for a greater emphasis on mother-tongue education and the promotion of indigenous languages.
Rahul Gandhi's intervention in this debate highlights the political dimensions of language policy. By framing English as a tool for empowerment and social justice, he directly challenges the BJP-RSS narrative and positions the Congress party as a champion of inclusive education. His statement is likely to resonate with those who believe that access to English is essential for upward mobility in an increasingly interconnected world. The discussion is expected to continue shaping education policy and political discourse in India.
