West Bengal distinguishes itself from several other opposition-ruled states in India through the seemingly cordial relationship between the Governor and the state government. This stands in stark contrast to the tensions observed in states like Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka, where frequent disagreements between the Governor and the elected state government have become commonplace.
In West Bengal, recent events suggest a more collaborative dynamic. During the budget session, West Bengal Governor C V Ananda Bose gave a concise six-minute address, highlighting the state government's commitment to inclusive development. He stressed social harmony, noting the steps taken to maintain communal peace and Kolkata's reputation as one of the safest cities in the country. The Governor also acknowledged the state's financial constraints and pending dues from the central government, while praising the Chief Minister's leadership and the government's dedication to the welfare of the people. Furthermore, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and the Speaker personally escorted the Governor out of the Assembly after the address, which is seen as a rare moment of civility.
However, the relationship is not without its complexities. On February 5, 2026, the Governor stopped reading his address midway and walked out of the House, which triggered political reactions from the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari interpreted the Governor's action as a symbolic rejection of the speech prepared by the state government. Before departing, the Governor exchanged words with Mamata Banerjee, who placed a shawl around him, but she did not comment on their discussion.
Despite these instances, there have been instances where the Governor has taken a different approach. For example, Governor Bose submitted a report to the Centre regarding a fire incident in South 24 Parganas, highlighting lapses that led to the tragedy. While refraining from blaming anyone, he noted the failures of concerned authorities.
The role of the Governor in India's federal structure has been a subject of debate. Appointed by the President on the advice of the central government, the Governor is meant to be an apolitical head who acts on the advice of the council of ministers. However, the Governor possesses certain constitutional powers, such as giving or withholding assent to bills passed by the state legislature. This has led to friction in several states, where Governors have been accused of siding with the central government and obstructing the functioning of state governments.
Despite the occasional tensions, the overall dynamic between the Governor and the government in West Bengal appears more functional compared to the open conflicts seen elsewhere. This is reflected in the Governor's commendation of the state's dedication to rights and efforts to bolster the economy.
It's important to note that even with a seemingly cordial relationship, differing political views and constitutional obligations can lead to disagreements. The rejection of the resolution regarding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and the remarks made by Mamata Banerjee regarding land for border fencing and the BSF's jurisdiction demonstrate the existing tensions. These issues highlight the delicate balance that the Governor and the state government must maintain within India's federal structure.