Sanjay Manjrekar, the former Indian batter, has ignited a debate in the cricketing world by asserting that the T20 World Cup should not be granted the same status as the 50-over World Cup. With the T20 World Cup 2026 approaching, Manjrekar believes that the 'Cricket World Cup' title should be exclusively reserved for the 50-over format, a tournament played once every four years, emphasizing its historical significance and enduring legacy. He suggests the T20 version should revert to its original name, 'World T20'.

Manjrekar's argument centers on the frequency and the perceived difference in prestige between the two tournaments. The ODI World Cup, with its longer history dating back to 1975, is seen as the pinnacle of the 50-over game, demanding a unique level of endurance, strategy, and skill. In contrast, the T20 World Cup, first held in 2007, is a more recent addition, occurring every two years and emphasizing explosive, fast-paced action. Manjrekar feels that the distinction in frequency diminishes the T20 World Cup's claim to the same level of prestige as its ODI counterpart.

“For me the 'Cricket World Cup' will always be the 50 overs World Cup," Manjrekar stated, emphasizing his viewpoint. "The T20 version held every two years must not be given the same status of a World Cup that comes once in 4 years. I prefer the original name for it - The WorldT20".

The 2026 T20 World Cup, hosted by India and Sri Lanka starting February 7, will be the 10th edition of the tournament. India, the defending champions after their undefeated run in the 2024 edition held in the West Indies and the USA, will be looking to continue their dominance in the format.

Manjrekar's comments have stirred varied reactions, with some supporting his traditionalist view of prioritizing the ODI format's legacy, while others argue that the T20 World Cup has earned its place as a major global tournament, attracting huge audiences and driving innovation in the sport. Some might argue the T20 format has different challenges. The debate also brings up questions about the evolving landscape of cricket, where the fast-paced T20 format gains popularity while the traditional ODI format seeks to maintain its relevance.

This isn't the first time Manjrekar's opinions have caused a stir. Earlier in the year, he received mixed reactions when he suggested that Virat Kohli may have been favouring ODI cricket, which Manjrekar considers the "easiest format". These statements led to a response from India's captain, Shubman Gill, who countered that no format is easy and pointed to India's lack of World Cup wins since 2011 as evidence.

Regardless of opinions, Manjrekar's statement has amplified the discussion around the significance and status of different formats in cricket. As the T20 World Cup 2026 approaches, the debate about which format truly deserves the 'World Cup' title is expected to continue, fueled by passionate fans and experts alike.