The Supreme Court is currently reviewing the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act (NSA), with concerns raised about his medical condition. Wangchuk's detention, which began on September 26, 2025, followed violent protests in Ladakh concerning statehood and the Sixth Schedule status for the region.

During the hearing, the Centre defended Wangchuk's detention, asserting it was a preventive measure due to concerns about public order and regional security in a sensitive border area. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Union government, argued that Wangchuk's speeches were inflammatory and posed a threat to national security. Mehta contended that Wangchuk was inciting the younger generation in Ladakh, potentially leading to unrest similar to that seen in countries like Nepal, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. He stated that Wangchuk's references to Gandhian principles were a facade to mask the allegedly inflammatory content of his speeches, which he claimed encouraged violent protests, including self-immolation. The Centre also argued that Wangchuk's statements suggested Ladakh would have greater freedom under Chinese rule and that he had misled people by claiming Ladakh residents could not frame their own laws or choose their representatives.

Gitanjali Angmo, Wangchuk's wife, filed a plea challenging his detention under the NSA, arguing it was illegal. She alleged malicious intent on the part of the detaining authority, asserting that the claim Wangchuk incited violence was false and fabricated. Angmo also claimed the Ministry of Home Affairs had reservations about Wangchuk's inclusion in a committee formed to discuss statehood and safeguards for Ladakh.

The Supreme Court bench, consisting of Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale, is considering the matter. The court's review is limited to whether the proper procedure was followed in the detention, ensuring Wangchuk was not unfairly treated. The Centre has highlighted safeguards within the NSA, such as the requirement for the District Magistrate's detention order to be confirmed by the State Government and the detainee's right to representation before an advisory board. The hearing is scheduled to continue, with the court expected to further examine the justifications for Wangchuk's detention and his medical condition.