Animal rights activists and dog lovers across India have largely welcomed the Supreme Court's recent order regarding stray dogs, which modifies an earlier directive to confine all stray dogs to shelters. The new order emphasizes the release of sterilized and vaccinated dogs back into their original localities. However, concerns remain, particularly around the handling of "aggressive dogs" and the practical implementation of designated feeding zones.
The Supreme Court's modified order stipulates that stray dogs infected with rabies or displaying aggressive behavior should not be released back into their localities. Instead, these animals are to be kept in separate confinement. This revision of the previous order, which mandated the removal of all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR streets to shelters, came after criticism from animal welfare groups who argued shelters are inadequate and that the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023 were not being followed. Many activists celebrated the new ruling as a victory for compassion. Rahul Gandhi, a leader of the opposition Congress party, called the revised order a "progressive step toward balancing animal welfare and public safety".
Despite the positive reactions, a key concern revolves around the definition of "aggressive" dogs. Several activists have questioned who will determine what qualifies as aggressive behavior in a dog. PETA India has urged the public to remain vigilant to ensure dogs are not wrongly labeled and unfairly picked up, encouraging people to file complaints with the municipality if such incidents occur. Maneka Gandhi, a BJP leader and animal rights activist, also pointed out that the court had not defined what an aggressive dog is.
The order also addresses the feeding of stray dogs, stating that it should be confined to designated feeding zones, with street feeding prohibited. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) has been directed to create feeding areas in each municipal ward. While some, like Yogita Kumari from an animal welfare NGO in Mohali, believe designated feeding spots will encourage peaceful coexistence, others are skeptical. Charvi Salil, co-founder of Bowsome Senior Dogs India Foundation, questions the idea of feeder zones. Critics suggest that such spaces are difficult to manage, can lead to dog fights, and that many municipalities lack the infrastructure to effectively run them.
The MCD has stated it will implement the Supreme Court's revised order fully. Mayor Raja Iqbal Singh said the MCD would ensure 100% implementation of the order. However, Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) and NGOs are seeking clarity on how the directive will be implemented on the ground. Atul Goyal, president of the United Residents' Joint Action, stated that without a clear plan, it would be a mess and that RWAs would end up being blamed.
Animal welfare groups and activists are advocating for their inclusion as official stakeholders in all decisions related to stray animals. Ambika Shukla, Trustee of the People for Animals organization, emphasized the experience and expertise that animal welfare organizations can bring to the table. She noted that the ABC Rules, 2023, already explain how stray dogs should be handled, but the problem lies in the implementation.
The central government has reiterated its commitment to addressing the issue of stray dogs through a humane and scientific approach. The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, promote the capture-neuter-vaccinate-release method. The government is also providing financial assistance for sterilization and supporting veterinary hospitals and animal shelters.
Ultimately, the success of the Supreme Court's order hinges on effective implementation and coordination between municipal corporations, NGOs, and community members. Concerns about defining "aggressive" dogs and managing feeding zones need to be addressed to ensure both animal welfare and public safety.
