The ongoing inheritance dispute over the estate of the late auto-components industrialist Sunjay Kapur has taken a surprising turn with the emergence of alleged call detail records linked to Priya Kapur, Sunjay's widow. The records, which surfaced on social media, have ignited discussions and raised questions about the accuracy of Priya Kapur's claims regarding her location on a crucial date related to the execution of Sunjay Kapur's contested will.

The controversy centers around Priya Kapur's affidavit submitted to the Delhi High Court, in which she stated that she was physically present in Gurugram on March 21, 2025, during the execution of Sunjay Kapur's will. However, the alleged call detail records indicate that her mobile phone was located in New Delhi on the same day. This discrepancy, if authenticated and admitted by the court, could significantly impact the case, which involves an estate estimated at approximately Rs 30,000 crore.

Legal experts emphasize the importance of consistency between sworn statements and electronic evidence. Advocate Swapnil Kothari noted that courts become extremely cautious when affidavits clash with electronic evidence, and even a single inconsistency can lead to a re-examination of the entire narrative. Advocate Prem Rajani pointed out that courts tend to examine every document and surrounding circumstance with care in high-value inheritance disputes, emphasizing that precision, consistency, and intent all matter.

The emergence of these call records coincides with ongoing objections raised by Sunjay Kapur's children, Samaira and Kiaan, regarding the authenticity of the will. Previous filings have questioned the will's validity, citing spelling errors, incorrect pronoun usage, and internal inconsistencies. While these issues may seem minor individually, critics argue that their cumulative effect warrants closer examination. Senior Advocate Ashok Paranjpe underscored the importance of precision in testamentary documents of significant value.

The Delhi High Court has yet to determine whether the alleged call records will be admitted as evidence and how much weight they will carry. The court's decision will be crucial in determining the future course of the legal battle. The emergence of this purported digital trail adds another layer to an already intricate legal battle, transforming a family inheritance dispute into a closely monitored courtroom contest.

The children have offered a contrasting account, with Samaira alleging that her university fees were not paid following her father's death. Karisma Kapoor, Sunjay's ex-wife, has maintained silence amidst the growing controversy.