An unexpected decision by Team Canada's Olympic selection committee has left hockey analyst Ryan Clark "utterly perplexed," as the team once again opted to exclude Edmonton Oilers forward Zach Hyman from its roster. The announcement, made earlier this week, has sparked considerable debate among fans and media, with many questioning the rationale behind overlooking a player who has consistently demonstrated his value and chemistry, particularly alongside Connor McDavid.
"It's not just that Hyman is a good player; it's the undeniable synergy he has with McDavid," Clark stated during a recent television appearance. "For years, we've seen how Hyman's tenacity, hockey sense, and willingness to go to the dirty areas complement McDavid's skill and speed. To ignore that, especially in a short tournament like the Olympics, is a gamble I'm not sure Canada needs to take".
Hyman's current NHL season further bolsters the argument for his inclusion. In 36 games, he has tallied 22 goals and 14 assists, showcasing his offensive capabilities and consistent production. Beyond the scoresheet, Hyman brings a level of grit and determination that is often crucial in high-stakes international competitions. He is known for his strong work ethic, penalty-killing abilities, and power play contributions, making him a versatile asset for any team.
The decision is particularly surprising considering Team Canada's historical tendency to bring players who have established chemistry with their star players. Clark pointed to the 2010 Olympics, where Chris Kunitz was selected to play alongside Sidney Crosby, citing their pre-existing familiarity as a key factor. "In 2010, the team allowed Chris Kunitz to accompany Sidney Crosby because Crosby knew how to play with him," Clark explained. "I felt the same way about McDavid in the Four Nations [Face-Off tournament]; they spent half the tournament trying to find someone who could play with him".
The snub is not only a point of contention for analysts but also for fans, many of whom have taken to social media to express their disappointment. Some argue that Hyman's consistent production and established connection with McDavid should have made him a lock for the team. Others acknowledge the depth of talent in Canadian hockey but still believe that Hyman's unique skill set and proven track record warrant a spot on the roster.
While the initial 25-man roster has been announced, the door may not be completely closed for Hyman. An injury to Brayden Point has created uncertainty, and Hyman's name is being mentioned as a potential replacement. As the Olympics draw closer, his performance in the NHL will be closely scrutinized, and a strong showing could force the team's management to reconsider their decision.
Whether Hyman ultimately makes the team or not, the debate surrounding his exclusion highlights the difficult choices facing Team Canada's selectors. With an abundance of talent to choose from, some deserving players are inevitably left out. However, the continued omission of a player with Hyman's skill set and proven chemistry raises questions about the criteria being used and whether the team is truly maximizing its potential for success.